Friday, December 12, 2014

Sixth Hour Personal Essay Rubric


An effective personal essay includes:
The writer’s voice
An attention grabbing intro
Proper use of grammar and usage and mechanics
Maybe the writer’s own personal experiences
A clear and engaging message, but also complex exploration of ideas
Lucid organization of ideas
Use of figurative language: simile, metaphor, personification, description
Clear and purposeful syntax
Connections to multiple and varied examples
An organic structure that is dependent upon purpose, content, writer and message
Effective transitions
1,000 word minimum







Fourth Hour Personal Essay Rubric


An essay that receives an “A” will include all of the following:
Evidence of effort, time, and energy
Evidence of the writer’s authentic voice
Evidence of the writer’s knowledge about the topic.
Ideas that lead logically to a complex message.
The effective use of rhetorical devices:  Allusions, simile, metaphor, personification, rhetorical questions, etc.
Many varied and relevant examples.
A clear and effective and organic pattern of organization and structure.
Proper MLA format
Proper grammar, usage and mechanics
1000 words

Effective transitions

Third Hour Personal Essay Rubric


An essay that receives a grade of “A” will include the following:
A clear message
Evidence of the writer’s engagement with the topic
Evidence of the writer’s authentic voice
A combination of “showing” and “telling” through the use of real and/or hypothetical examples
Relevant examples
Content that is thought provoking
Precise word choice (rhetorical specificity)
The characteristics of a personal essay v. a book report
Clear and effective and purposeful syntax
Strong diction
Effective transitions
An effective and organic organization and structure
MLA Format/no spelling errors
The effective use of rhetorical strategies: simile, metaphor, parallel structure, personification, repetition, rhetorical questions

1,000 word minimum

First Hour Personal Essay "Rubric"

An effective personal essay will include the following:

The use of outside and varied examples
A clear and engaging message
Typed/MLA Format
The writer’s authentic voice 
A structure that is organic and appropriate to the content and purpose (avoid the 5 P/ 3 pronged thesis)
Full development of original ideas
A fresh and original approach with fresh and original language (avoid cliche)
Transitions between ideas
Effective use of rhetorical devices: simile, metaphor, repetition, rhetorical questions, other types of figurative language
Varied and appropriate vocabulary
1,000 words



Make it good.


Thursday, December 4, 2014

The Personal Essay Frequently Asked Questions

Many students have been asking for more concrete direction regarding the personal essay.  I put together a document that answers frequently asked questions. I hope it helps.  Let me know if you have any questions.

https://drive.google.com/a/fhps.net/file/d/0B0ndMsFKkNibcTNOenc1V1RNY0lwZFlFMm55MTQwU2NQdkl3/view?usp=sharing

Also, I found the following to be a very useful article about the creative process and visualizing the personal essay informative: https://www.creativenonfiction.org/online-reading/picturing-personal-essay-visual-guide.

You can find many of the personal essays referenced in the above article on-line.

 Like here: http://www.psych.utah.edu/psych4130/Berry_W.pdf

And here: http://www2.hawaii.edu/~facoba/readings/cofer.htm

And here: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1996/06/24/the-fourth-state-of-matter

And here: http://grammar.about.com/od/classicessays/a/strtwoolfessay_2.htm

Wednesday, December 3, 2014

If you were absent on 12/3

I handed out the bookmark below.  We read and tracked our thinking.  Tomorrow, we will do the same.  On Friday, we have the vocab quiz.  On Monday, it's discussion circles.



Tuesday, December 2, 2014

Dr. J Michael Bishop Extra Credit Assignment

I waited to post this so that I could share my Jekyll and Hyde essay with you.  It is a model of the authentic type of response that I'd like you to produce.

So, here's what I'm thinking.  We went and listened to a Nobel Prize winner share some information about cancer and his work.  As I was sitting there, trying, once again, to understand  the src gene, I was thinking about the idea that there was much more going on for all of us last night than just trying to make sense of difficult content.

From our discussion today, I have gathered that some of you are in awe of having been in the same room with a great scientific mind.  That is exciting!  I hope you were inspired to strive for that level of greatness in whichever field to which you choose to dedicate your life.  It doesn't have to be science.

But, let's be honest.  While some of us were able to glean bits of understanding, most of Dr. Bishop's presentation was incredibly sophisticated. And some of us, we hold no real fascination for the mutation of genes, Let's take it a step further: for some of you, pieces of the presentation may have triggered a mild case of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder that is the result of the summer reading and from which you might just have been beginning to heal, I get that.  Still, I'd like you to consider the whole experience, from the moment you surrendered your vehicle to the valet to the scarfing down of much water and cheese (did you see that table at the end of the night?) to the long sit of the presentation and write a personal essay that explores and evaluates the many facets of an experience like the one we had the opportunity to attend last night.

Real writing.  Real thinking. That is what I am looking for.

Monday, December 1, 2014

THIS JUST IN

J. Michael Bishop will be holding a special FHN only session at 3:30 today at the Van Andel Institute!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  I mean, I'll be there.  I hope you will be too.

Sunday, November 30, 2014

For tomorrow 12/1.

 Don't forget tomorrow at 4:00 pm is the water and cheese party at the Van Andel followed by the speaker, J. Michael Bishop at 5:00.  Remember to dress appropriately.
Also,  I've been thinking a lot about how to get all of you thinking about Jekyll and Hyde.  So,tomorrow, you will write an argumentative type response to a given prompt. It should take you the whole hour.  For homework this week, you will also be doing some writing.  You should plan on about a half an hour or so each night.  Additionally, you may have a bit of multiple choice to get through and we have the final vocab quiz on Friday, 12/5.

Monday, November 24, 2014

If you were gone on 11/24

You need to make up the vocab quiz, finish up the crosswords and read the novel for 12/1.
Reading comprehension quiz on 12/1 when we return from break.

Today was the last day to sign up for the extra credit opportunity.

The bank of words that you will be quizzed on 12/5:

languidly
sedulously
capacious
mien
multifarious
succumb
exorbitant
obsequiously
turpitude
acquiescence
denizen
propensity
astute
disparity
inscrutable
insurgent
ruminate

bated
inveteretely
irrevocably
idiosyncratic
imperious
incipient
poignant
premonitory

Sunday, November 23, 2014

11/21

Vocab Quiz 11/24: Dr. Jekyll Was Quite AT Ease and The Carew Murder Case
Finish the crosswords by 11/25.
Finish reading the novel by 12/2.  I will be checking for reading completion on that day.

Thursday, November 20, 2014

11/20

Today, students turned in their context clues for Search for Hyde.
Additionally, they took both the vocabulary and reading quizzes for that section.

Students received the next set of vocabulary words today for which they are searching for context clues for tomorrow.  Students should also read both Dr. Jekyll Was Quite At Ease and The Carew Murder for tomorrow. A reading quiz will be given tomorrow and the vocab quiz will take place on Monday.

Any students wishing to attend the J Michael Bishop extra credit opportunity: http://vai.convio.net/site/MessageViewer?dlv_id=6821&em_id=2502.0&pgwrap=n
Please let me know by 11/24.  There is a sign up sheet in class, but you can also notify me by email, Facebook, etc.  You are responsible for your own transportation to and from.  A short written response will be required. It is worth 10 extra credit points.  If you are a student who would like to go, but cannot provide your own transportation, let me know and I will try to connect you to others who are going and are interested in carpooling.

J Michael Bishop worked with Harold Varmus  They won "the Nobel Peace Prize for their discovery of the cellular origin of retroviral oncogenes in 1989" (Mukherjee, 363).  Varmus was the one who referenced Beowulf in his acceptance speech. It isn't every day you get to see a Nobel Peace Prize winner speak.  My understanding is that his lecture is directed toward the layperson (that is every day folks) not oncologists. I'm hoping we have a good turn out. Let me know if you want to go.  All the details are on the flyer at the above link.

The vocab words for today's crossword are accost, pedant, contrive, disposition, unobtrusive, assail, ferocity, disinter, lurid, odious, conflagration, insensate,

Monday, November 17, 2014

11/17/14

Today students took the vocabulary quiz for the "Story of the Door" section in Jekyll and Hyde.
Additionally, they received the next set of vocabulary words over which they will be quizzed on Wednesday, 11/19.

For homework tonight, students are searching for and recording context clues for the vocabulary words in "Search for Hyde."  The words are as follows: iniquity, disquietude, transpire, citadel, repose, concourse, benefactor, geniality.

Also, there will be a quiz over that section tomorrow, so read carefully and closely for detail.

Friday, November 14, 2014

11/14/14

Today in class, students completed a rhetorical analysis assignment based on the first chapter of Jekyll and Hyde.  

We also discussed the Living Like Weasels essay.

For Monday, read the essay She: Portrait of the Essay as a Warm Body and make a point comparison to the essay On Essays: Literature's Most Misunderstood Form.  You might use a tri-fold to organize your ideas.  On one side, write all of the points that are unique to the "She" essay, On the other side, write the points that are unique to the "Misunderstood" essay and then in the center write about the points they share in common.  You can find the "She" essay here:  http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/98sep/ozick.htm

Additionally, study for the 14 word narrative quiz that will take place on Monday.

Thursday, November 13, 2014

11/13/14

Today in class, we shared our Pithy Quotations and discussed the verities of authentic essay writing.  Additionally, we discussed the rhetorical strategies in Joyas Voladoras as a model of an authentic essay.  Today, I distributed an essay titled Living Like Weasels by another of my literary favorites, Annie Dillard. Students are reading and annotating for homework.  What are the rhetorical tools that Dillard is using to convey her ideas?  What is her argument?  What are the notable moves that she is making  with syntax, imagery, figurative language, diction? Here's a link to the essay: http://www.courses.vcu.edu/ENG200-lad/dillard.htm

After all of this, we had a bit of time left to read Story of the Door from Jekyll and Hyde.  Whatever we did not finish is homework.

On Friday, we will do some rhetorical analysis with Story of the Door and the ways in which Stevenson sets up the idea of duality.

On Monday, we will take the first vocab quiz and you will receive the next crossword for the next section for which we will again explore context clues.  We will quiz on that one on Friday, 11/ 21.

Here's something to look forward to:  I don't like for any of us to have homework over Thanksgiving, Winter or Spring Breaks.  So, there will be none.

Wednesday, November 12, 2014

11/12/14

Today we had our Jekyll and Hyde discussion.  Students shared their research and provided background knowledge for the reading of Stevenson's novel. In addition, students finished the pithy quotations work, but we did not have time to share.  We will do so tomorrow.

A few important announcements:

  • Our vocab quiz for the first section of the novel will take place on Monday, 11/17.  It covers only 14 words.  Prepare for these to get progressively more challenging.
  • Homework tonight: read and annotate the essay Joyas Voladoras by Brian Doyle.  There is much going on in it rhetorically with diction and syntax and selection of detail and imagery.  Try to determine Doyle's message.  In other words, what should the reader understand as a result of having read the essay?  If you weren't in class, you can find the essay here: http://theamericanscholar.org/joyas-volardores/#.VGNjkfnF-So
The plan for Thursday and Friday is to present the pithy quotations, discuss Doyle's essay, read Story of the Door and write a brief rhetorical analysis that focuses on Stevenson's infusion of the concept of duality.  That should keep us busy.   There will be some essay reading assigned over the weekend and a new vocab crossword on Monday.

Tuesday, November 11, 2014

In class: 11/11/14

Today, we took a look at all of those context clues that students searched for last night.  I am hoping that you found this useful as a vocabulary activity. Probably, we will be prepared to quiz on those on Monday.

 I talked about the two "tracks" that are currently running through our study in AP Lang.  The first involves Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. The weekend research project and the resulting class discussion tomorrow should help us build the background knowledge necessary to comprehend the reading on a variety of levels: literal, historical, etc.  Additionally, our vocabulary study is meant to help us move smoothly through Stevenson's Victorian prose.

The second track is about essay writing.  Today, we read an article in class titled, On Essays: Literature's Most Misunderstood Form. I told students that I hoped it changed their lives.  I wasn't being dramatic.  I really hope it opened some minds today about what it should be like to write and/or read an essay.  I asked students to find a "pithy" quotation in the essay.  That is one that they feel important or one that they think changes their ideas about essay writing or adds to their understanding of essay writing.  Students are putting the quotations on paper and then writing a paraphrase and a rationale for their choice.  You can find the essay here:http://www.pw.org/content/essays.

A messy vocabulary list--which is only meant to aid your comprehension-- for the essay is a follows:


Cleave:  to adhere firmly and closely or loyally and unwaveringly
Artifice: craftsmanship or conventions
Postmodernism: of, relating to, or being any of various movements in reaction to modernism that are typically characterized by a return to traditional materials and forms (as in architecture) or by ironic self-reference and absurdity (as in literature)
Machinations: crafty schemes, plots
Flagrante delicto: in the very act of committing the offense.
Metaphysical: highly abstract
Self-effacing: the act or fact of keeping oneself in the background, as in humility.
Tincture: a slight infusion, as of some element or quality:
Accrue: to happen or result as a natural growth, addition, etc.
Vacillations: a state of indecision or irresolution.
unsteady movement; fluctuation.
Amorphous: lacking definite form; having no specific shape; formless
 Protean: readily assuming different forms or characters; extremely variable.
 Averse: having a strong feeling of opposition, antipathy, repugnance, etc.;opposed
 Narcissism: inordinate fascination with oneself
 Distillation: the purification or concentration of a substance, the obtaining of theessence or volatile properties contained in it, or the separation of onesubstance from another, by such a process.




The assignment for the pithy quotations is as follows:

Pithy Quotations

The idea of the assignment is to select a quotation which you consider to be important or “pithy.” (The pith of a plant is that center part of the stem that contains and carries nutrients to the rest of the plant; hence it is its most rich and important part.)   You will need to choose what you think is important or meaningful in the reading and apply it to your own experience and your understanding of essay writing.

The “Pithy Quote” assignment has three parts:

v  The first is to find a section of the reading that you consider important or meaningful and quote it directly.  Write it out on the poster board provided for you.
v  The second part is to paraphrase the quotation (on your own lined paper that will be turned in).  Put it into your own words.
v  The third part is to write an explanation for your choice.  How does it help you better understand the assignment? What does it teach you about writing?  Explore the wider implications by comparing the ways in which the information from the quotation matches up to your previous knowledge or experience.  How has it changed your thinking?  How has it added to your understanding of essay writing?
v  Be prepared to present all of this to the class.


Monday, November 10, 2014

Jekyll and Hyde Vocab Study

Today, students began the hour with a "pre-assessment" crossword that focused on the first 14 vocabulary words from Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.  After giving students a chance to figure out the words on their own, we then took a look at the complete list of words and tried to think our way through finding answers to the crossword.  Sometimes, it came down to counting letters.  :)  That's okay.  It is still thinking and using process of elimination which is a valuable skill for standardized tests and--dare I say it?--life.

The tricky part about learning vocab is that all students need to understand that language is complex. You can't always use synonyms interchangeably without having them sound ridiculous. For example, one of our words today is "countenance."  A synonym for that word is "face."  But I wouldn't say, "This morning I woke up and put some make up on my countenance."  Countenance is really more about expression and appearance, but the dictionary tells us that "face" is a legitimate synonym. That was the problem with the vocabulary narratives that students wrote for the Beowulf vocabulary.  Many times, the words sounded forced and the language inflated because of the student's attempt to swap one synonym for another.

 I have been reading a bit of research lately about vocabulary acquisition.  Researchers say that kids learn vocab best when they are forced to search for context clues that support the meaning of a word.  So, that is what we did today for the first 14.  I distributed some charts and we spent the rest of the hour, searching through the first section of Jekyll and Hyde for context clues and recording them in an attempt to fully understand the nuances of each word.  We ended the hour with an impromptu quiz--not for credit--to see if the researchers were correct.  First hour was kind of quiet today with only nine students in attendance, so the results are inconclusive.

It is going to be difficult to recreate this experience for folks who were absent today.  The first 14 vocabulary words are as follows: austere, sentiment, apocryphal, affirmative, eminently, countenance, reprove, sordid, singularly, catholicity, negligence, florid, ravage, coquetry.

Find the words in the section titled, "Story of the Door."  Determine the context clues that enable a reader to determine the meaning of the word.  For example, on page 3, Stevenson writes,

"Mr. Utterson the lawyer was a man of a rugged countenance who was never lighted by a smile:"

Probably, if I did not know teh meaning of the word "countenance", I could figure out that it means "expression" because of the "never lighted by a smile" context clue.  So, those are the words that I would record. Students should have all 14 finished for tomorrow.  Additionally, prepare your research for our background discussion on Wednesday.

Saturday, October 4, 2014

RA Rubric

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZL4Dbnc1XhAF_DyaaBtTuRC1U1wtD2cZ_4kZb57OKkc/edit?usp=sharing

Monday, September 1, 2014

The test

Just revised the test.  Eliminated some multiple choice, made the matching much more manageable with larger descriptions of the terms.  So, yes, there will be matching.  But, I don't think it is as crazy as the matching last year.  I eliminated some.  There will be an essay question as well.

Friday, August 29, 2014

AP Meeting

Two big "takeaways" and a clarification....

First, the clarification....I've been replaying the meeting in my head and  one thing I remember is that we started talking a little bit about grading  and I was trying to quickly explain my philosophy when I said "I don't care about your grades."  I hope you all know that that didn't mean "I don't care about your grades."  I know that you care deeply about your grades and, of course, I care about what you care about. What I meant when I said that was that I care most about your mastery of the content.  And, of course, if you master the content, the grades will take care of themselves.  That's what I meant. I am sorry if for any moment today you might have thought that what is important to you is not important to me.  That is wholly untrue.

Takeaways.....

1.  Review, review, review.
2.  Let the blog and the maps be the tools that help narrow your focus for review.


Thursday, August 28, 2014

New Drugs for Old Cancers

Two traditional Achilles' heels.

Three new Achilles' heels.

Of course, this Achilles' heel thing is a sweet rhetorical move.  You know, with the "long molecular 'foot'" and all.

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

No one had labored in vain

I think we needed this cautiously cheery little chapter.  I don't have much more to say about it.  Anyone else? (crickets:)

Sunday, August 24, 2014

The hallmarks of cancer

The list of six.....

The long, slow march of cancer.....our long, slow march through this book is nearing its end as we reach Part Six.

I still want to create maps for Parts 4 and 5.  I will try to have those done by the end of the day tomorrow.

A Risky Prediction: the sequel

That was a tough section, so I am coming back to it.  I really need your help with this one.  What do you see as the major "takeaways" from having read through all of that craziness?  Everyone who contributes wins as you retain 29% more of the material with which you engage.

A Risky Prediction

So, this is the part where I do a little bragging.  Some of you may have heard me talk about my sister-in-law, Sandy.  This is the link to her lab: http://mclab.bwh.harvard.edu/index.html.  But when I met her in 2005, she worked with Robert Weinberg in his lab.  I toured it.  Confession: At the time, I had no idea about the importance of Robert Weinberg and his lab.  And, you now know who Robert Weinberg is. And so, you can see why I am kind of star struck by my own sister-in-law.

Here is another link to something else she is involved in.  http://www.dfhcc.harvard.edu/membership/profile/member/1641/0/?PHPSESSID=e2643a915c31d7a861de014cc95517b5

She is the kind of person who would be embarrassed to know that I am showing her off here.  Very humble.  So, I'm not going to tell her.  Let's keep it to ourselves.  Nah, I'm going to tell her.


ONE HUNDRED PAGES TO GO!!!!!

Piece of cake.  Finish strong, people.

The Wind in the Trees

Explain the connection between "jammed accelerators" and "missing brakes" and cancer.

The hunting of the sarc

True or False  Howard Temin's discovery of reverse transcription advanced the understanding of human carcinogenesis.

Define carcinogenesis.

Define carcinogen.

Define oncogene.

Define kinase.

I think that pages 360, 361 and 362 are probably the most difficult of the entire book.  Tons of scientific vocabulary and description of processes make it difficult to comprehend fully.  Good readers tolerate a little ambiguity in order to get the big picture.

Who are Varmus and Bishop and for what did they receive the Nobel Prize?

What famous epic poem does Varmus use to discuss the cancer cell?

And holy recursive text structure, Batman.  Hopefully, by now you know what I mean when I say that.  If you don't, just ask.

Under the Lamps of Viruses

"cancer-in-a-dish" 

I think the thing that makes this part so difficult to comprehend is that we have to understand the "prevailing schizophrenia" that Mukherjee mentions.  All of this stuff with cellular biology was going on at the same time that Farber and Frei were trying to throw cytotoxic drugs at cancer cells.  And Mukherjee has been saying over and over that what was necessary was to go back to basics to the structure of the cell.  "Frei and Farber returned to Boston with no significant change in the trajectories of their thoughts about curing cancer" ???????? After Temin's discussion???? 

So, if you understand this section, you get the retrovirus idea, Sol Spiegelman's work and how those relate to HIV, and you understand the implications of "cause on one side and cure on the other" (355).

A Unitary Cause

Isn't it an incredible relief to learn about Carla's remission?

All these pages later, we return to Virchow....science is always turning back on itself.  And it is interesting to me, as a reader, that Boveri's theory, which was so close to the truth, was actually the truth, was buried by circumstance: the convenience of Rous' virus theory.  Are we  dumping ice buckets over our heads today needlessly?  Are the answers within reach?  Buried somewhere by convenience and circumstance or something more menacing?

If you understood this section, you can describe the progression of biological discovery that begins with Mendel and ends with Monod.  You also understand why Mukherjee has to cover that to prepare us for the retrovirus discussion.  And that section and some that will follow are the ones that I warned you about at our AP Lang meeting.  Even though Mukherjee tries to explain it to the layperson, I feel he falls short here.  He seems to pushing on the accelerator when I need him to slow down.

Tuesday, August 19, 2014

That point in the reading...

where you put a sticky note in front of the Acknowledgements so you can feel how many pages you have left.  #Hollaback


Cool Atwood Quote

"Who says there are no such things as monsters?  I say they are everywhere. But we are not powerless.  We have an incredibly powerful weapon with which to fight each and every one.  That weapon is language.  "A word after a word after a word is power."- Margaret Atwood.

The Map and the Parachute

To model my reading of this section, and mix it up a bit, I am simply going to list a couple of the sentences of note.  By that I mean, sentences that seem central to comprehension of this section and sentences that  exhibit syntactical craftsmanship. It's interesting to pay attention to the sentences you notice and then try to figure out--and even more importantly, talk about-- why you notice them.  So, I'll go, and then maybe you'll go?  Share your sentence of note and tell us why you noticed it.

"An investigational agent, AIDS activists insisted, was no longer a hot-house flower meant to be cultivated only in the rarefied greenhouses of academic medicine, but rather a public resource merely waiting in the warming antechamber of science while doctors finished clinical trials that would, in the end, prove the efficacy of said drugs or procedures anyway" (322).

I noticed this one because it creates a link between the last section with all of the AIDS information and the significance of the patient activism for the world of chemotherapy.  I also think the comparison to the hot-house flower followed my the "warming antechamber of science" is an apt image of the trials, the length of the trials, as a process that is far removed from the urgency of saving lives.  It just takes too long.The choice of those sensory words "hot-house" and "warming antechamber" are essentially the same thing, but they work together to increase the temperature of the sentence and the issue towards which the reader is propelled with increasing speed at the end.  The reader is left with the most important idea roasting in the recesses (Sorry! Sometimes I can't help myself) of his mind....the drugs would have proven effective anyway.

"Patients, in short, had lost patience" (322).

Well....I mean, what do I have to say? You get it, right?

Okay.  Your turn.  I am going to create a map of section 4, which is all about prevention.








STAMP

I should tell you...as a reader, I had to go back and look up Huggins and Walpole at the end of the last section.  Huggins was the "chemical castration" guy and Walpole and Cole were the "estrogen antagonist", tamoxifen, breast cancer scientists.  I'm glad I went back because it seems in this section that we are back to chemotherapy and judging from the last line of the last section, it isn't going to be a cheery read.



The reason that I chose this book for our summer is represented in the narrative about Thomas Lynch.  No matter what you do: surgeon, insurance claims adjuster, lawyer, administrative assistant, advertising executive, graphic artist, heating and cooling technician, construction worker, stay at home dad; a facility with language is imperative.  If you are going to be good at what you choose to do, you need to be able to talk and write to people about what you do, what you want, what you need them to know, what you want them to think, what you want them to do.

A sentence I want you to notice: "Politically, too, AIDS activists borrowed language and tactics from cancer lobbyists, and then imbued this language with their own urgency and potency" (318).  Why might I want you to notice that sentence?

If you understand this section, you can discuss the impact that the AIDS epidemic is about to have on chemotherapy. 

Reading and Writing

http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2014/08/14/340351393/when-patients-read-what-their-doctors-write?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=20140817

Monday, August 18, 2014

Sweet Resource

http://wordsense.me/

"A Spider's Web"

This section is particularly exciting for a teacher of AP Lang.  This is the "slouch" section that I wrote about in an entry towards the beginning of summer.   This chapter also marks the beginning of Mukherjee's  Lewis Carroll's, Through the Looking Glass allusions.  He'll lay them on pretty heavy towards the end.  I think I also included some of Lewis Carroll's work about learning in an earlier entry.

Big ideas in this section:
screening trials
Detecting precancerous states as a means of prevention,
mammography and
the pap smear,
false positives,
false negatives,
underdiagnosis and
overdiagnosis.
the irony of small tumors and metastasis


And if you understood some of these big ideas, you understand the outcome of mammography, what it means for women over 50, what it means for those who are younger, and how that relates to bicycle helmets.  I have to tell you that none of it sits comfortably in this chair with me and my 46 year old self.

Curiouser and Curiouser

Curiously enough, I have tried to read this section countless times and I can't seem to focus on it.  I think it might be that it is August 15 and I am starting to FREAK out about school being just over two weeks away.  Every year, no matter how long I have been teaching-18 years, I freak out in this way.  I get scared that I won't be able to do the job.  Silly, I know.  I start to have nightmares in which my classroom is out of control and I have no lesson plans.  Craziness.

Thank goodness for Barry Marshall's decision to imbibe the "cloudy brown liquid."  Finally, a little excitement, right?

This importance of this section seems to be in the discussion of carcinogens and the quest for a cause.  Ultimately, it ends with the idea of going back further yet to "carcinogenesis."